Post by bisal42 on Feb 17, 2024 6:06:29 GMT
Some ten days ago in my note "Karma, Edi, Roberta and the standard" I argued that Edi Rama could not have the face to talk about "karma" (or the principle "what you do, what you will find") to Mrs. Roberta Metsola, President of the European Parliament. Since the reason was the corruption scandal, which last December involved several socialist MEPs, I compared the standard of President Metsola, who was personally committed immediately and to the maximum to remove any possible obstacles to the investigation of the Belgian prosecutor's office, with the standard of Rama, who personally and through the majority the parliamentarian defended the socialist deputy Saimir Tahiri to the point where he could not stand it anymore against the demands of the Albanian prosecutor's office for house control and arrest.
Ten days ago, the US Department Sweden Phone Number List of Justice published the charges against the former head of the FBI's New York office, Charles McGonigal. As it has become known, KM Rama befriended and bribed him through his two confidants, Neza and Ducka, so that the FBI would investigate a DP lobbyist. Through the "collaborating" lobbyist, the opposition would be blackmailed and controlled. These dramatic developments prompt me to return again to the benchmark comparison. This time, not how the boss reacts when the little ones commit violence, as is the case above with the parliamentary immunities in Brussels and Tirana. But how does the parliament react when the violence is done by the chief executive.
In September 2019, US President Trump asked Ukrainian President Zelensky to investigate Hunter Biden's affairs in Ukraine (the latter is currently being investigated by US justice for multiple affairs and, according to an e-mail, appears to be connected to business with Ducka e Rama). Using the Ukrainian investigation a year later in the 2020 presidential campaign where Donald Trump would face Joe Biden, Hunter's son was apparently the President's primary motive; significantly more important than the general fight against corruption. An American official denounced this request as an abuse of office, and in October the House of Representatives of the US Congress approved the parliamentary investigation of this matter to verify whether Donald Trump had committed serious violations that justified his dismissal (impeachment).
Ten days ago, the US Department Sweden Phone Number List of Justice published the charges against the former head of the FBI's New York office, Charles McGonigal. As it has become known, KM Rama befriended and bribed him through his two confidants, Neza and Ducka, so that the FBI would investigate a DP lobbyist. Through the "collaborating" lobbyist, the opposition would be blackmailed and controlled. These dramatic developments prompt me to return again to the benchmark comparison. This time, not how the boss reacts when the little ones commit violence, as is the case above with the parliamentary immunities in Brussels and Tirana. But how does the parliament react when the violence is done by the chief executive.
In September 2019, US President Trump asked Ukrainian President Zelensky to investigate Hunter Biden's affairs in Ukraine (the latter is currently being investigated by US justice for multiple affairs and, according to an e-mail, appears to be connected to business with Ducka e Rama). Using the Ukrainian investigation a year later in the 2020 presidential campaign where Donald Trump would face Joe Biden, Hunter's son was apparently the President's primary motive; significantly more important than the general fight against corruption. An American official denounced this request as an abuse of office, and in October the House of Representatives of the US Congress approved the parliamentary investigation of this matter to verify whether Donald Trump had committed serious violations that justified his dismissal (impeachment).